b7f49071ba
Cherry-picked Evo_Bot-related files from research/goto-controller: - CONTEXT.md (domain context) - ADR-0001: neuroevolution with fixed-topology ANN evolved by GA - GA parameters research doc - OscillatorBot sparring partner - prototypes/ga_gun_spike GA prototype - 13 neuroevolution reference papers Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.4 KiB
3.4 KiB
Neuroevolution gun with fixed-topology ANN evolved by GA
Evo_Bot needs a gun that adapts to each opponent's dodge patterns during a match, finds nonlinear movement patterns that histograms miss, and is original. We chose a fixed-topology feedforward ANN (91->8->1, 745 weights) whose weights are evolved by a mutation-only GA running on a parallel thread. This beats the alternatives (RL too slow to adapt in-match, Q-learning collapses to histogram for single-shot decisions, guess-factor histograms are unoriginal, transformer/LLM-style prediction is data-starved at ~14k ticks per match) while keeping implementation risk low by deferring topology evolution (NEAT) until the fixed network hits its ceiling.
Considered Options
- PPO / SAC (end-to-end RL): Too slow -- thousands of rounds to converge, cannot adapt mid-match. Explored in other bots in this repo.
- Q-learning for aiming: Collapses to a histogram. Single-shot aiming has no sequential decision structure for Q-learning to exploit.
- Guess-factor histogram: Proven and fast to converge (~15 ticks), but unoriginal -- 20 years of community tuning.
- Transformer / LLM-style sequence prediction: Data-starved. ~14k ticks per match vs billions needed for attention-based models.
- GA with crossover: Literature uniformly shows crossover is harmful for ANN weight evolution -- it breaks co-adapted weight configurations. Every modern neuroevolution paper (Uber Deep GA, NRA, OpenAI ES) drops it.
- CMA-ES: Ideal at d=750 weights (self-adapts sigma and covariance). More complex to implement; upgrade path from simple GA when needed.
Decision
Architecture:
- Evo_Bot (1v1) with modular gun interface:
feed(state)/aim() -> (angle, power) - Gun owns its evolution thread (parallel, never blocks inference)
TOPO_Gun (first gun implementation):
- Network: 91->8->1 (hidden size configurable), 745 weights
- Input: 30 ticks x (lateral_vel, delta_heading, wall_distance_ahead) + current distance = 91
- Output: guess factor (-1 to +1)
- Bullet power: deterministic distance-based formula (not learned)
- Evolution: population 300, clone loaded champion + small Gaussian mutations (ALL weights, sigma=0.005-0.01), NO crossover, single elite preserved unchanged
- Fitness: virtual bullet hits on 100 randomly sampled replay tape ticks, using real distance-based power
- Replay tape: rolling window ~2000 ticks (configurable)
- Weight persistence: per-opponent -> global fallback -> random init (load order)
- Cold start: first-ever run, don't fire until champion emerges; subsequent runs load weights, fire from tick 1
- Push new champion weights to inference when it hits better than current
Deferred:
- NEAT_Gun: deferred until TOPO_Gun hits its ceiling
- Virtual Guns: run multiple guns in parallel, fire whichever has best virtual hit rate
Boundaries:
- Bot controls firing discipline (when to shoot, energy management); gun always returns best aim
Consequences
- GA+ANN finds nonlinear patterns histograms miss, but needs more data (~50+ ticks vs ~15 for guess-factor histogram) before it outperforms
- Fixed topology before NEAT reduces implementation risk
- Mutation-only evolution simplifies implementation (no crossover logic)
- Parallel evolution thread reuses the pattern from SAC_LSTM_Bot (#48)
- Per-opponent weight persistence eliminates cold start after first encounter
- CMA-ES is the natural upgrade path if simple GA convergence is too slow (d=750 is CMA-ES sweet spot)