7f6ccfb0151ea2df76a469f681dababfd1ff5d16
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
7f6ccfb015 |
Ring mover heat retune (author: the user) - dodge bullets, ignore walls/centre,
re-plan 3x more often Uncommitted working-tree change in `the_floor_is_lava_ring.nim`, confirmed by the user as theirs. Committing it so it stops appearing in every job's `git status`. WHAT IT DOES - a coherent "be far more afraid of bullets" strategy: - BULLETS 2x hotter: BulletCore 10 -> 20, BulletAura 5 -> 10. - Walls weaker and thinner: WallRadiance 10 -> 5; the `WallHotness` default 10 -> 15 (so the heat falls off over ~3 tiles instead of 1, with a higher peak). - CENTRE PILLAR DISABLED: PillarHotness 30 -> 0, PillarRadiance 10 -> 0, so the bot may now use the middle of the arena instead of treating it as a no-go zone. - MUCH more reactive: CommitTicks 15 -> 5 and MinCommitTicks 5 -> 0, i.e. the dodge target is re-chosen 3x more often and a replan is allowed immediately. - `CorridorHeat` default 5 -> 10. This applies ONLY to the ring mover, which is NOT the shipped movement (the default is `tfil`), so the shipped bot is unaffected. TWO FACTS RECORDED, not objections - it is the user's call: 1. `CorridorHeat = 10` now EQUALS `PathDangerThreshold = 10`. The earlier measured taming set it to 5 precisely so a single corridor could no longer poison a path on its own (a corridor at 10 puts every tile along it at/over the threshold). That is part of what lifted the "band-weightable" fraction from 10.8% to 26.5%. At 10 the range weighting gets less to work with. 2. UNMEASURED: this retune has not been A/B'd. The ring mover it modifies was itself measured as a glass cannon (best offline hit rate, but round wins 16/49 -> 6/49, p=0.012). The two changes push in the same direction - hotter bullets and more frequent replanning mean MORE dodging and LESS time spent closing to the 100-200px band where our hit rate peaks (27% vs 5% at 450px). Worth an A/B before drawing conclusions, but it is an experiment, not a shipped change. |
||
|
|
9caf1d3728 |
movement: range-weighted TFIL variant + tamed heat field (opt-in, default unchanged)
New mover `the_floor_is_lava_ring.nim`, a COPY of `the_floor_is_lava.nim` (which stays byte-identical - the user explicitly wants the current TFIL preserved). Selected only via `TR_MOVEMENT=tfil_ring`; the default stays `tfil`. WHY: our measured real hit rate vs DrussGT is strongly range-dependent - 21.6% at 0-100px, 27.1% at 100-200px, 19.3% at 200-300, 10.9% at 300-400, 6.8% at 400-600, 5.4% at 600-800 - but we shoot from ~450px on average. Plain TFIL has no range preference at all. THE ONE CHANGE: the final tile draw is re-weighted toward a target band. rangeW(d) = 1.0 if lo<=d<=hi; exp(-((lo-d)/K)^2) if d<lo; exp(-((d-hi)/K)^2) if d>hi w_i = rangeW(d_i)^(1/T); chosen ~ Categorical(w) FLAT TOP on purpose: a Gaussian centred on the band midpoint would collapse the band to a point and destroy the within-band hedge. `T` is the only knob; `TR_TFIL_RANGE_TEMP=0` gives plain `rand(candidates.high)` - the exact control arm. Safety stays a HARD constraint: the weighting only reorders the draw among the pool the old code already accepted, so it can never pick a tile the old code rejected (monotone refinement). Small pools (<4) stay uniform. Randomness is deliberately KEPT: a measured A/B showed committing to the "best" tile made real hit rate WORSE (7.02% -> 5.10%), so the distribution is tilted, never removed. HEAT TAMING (ring copy only; env-overridable): TR_TFIL_CORRIDOR_HEAT 20.0 -> 5.0 TR_TFIL_WALL_HOTNESS 30.0 -> 10.0 Rationale, measured: `CorridorHeat=20` is TWICE `PathDangerThreshold=10`, so a single corridor could poison a path by itself; `WallHotness=30` with `WallRadiance=10` put the outer two tile rings over threshold on their own. Per-source shares of total lava: wall 60.6%, corridor 25.4%, pillar 7.4%, everything else <3%. MEASURED EFFECT (primary fixture, 20,026 ticks / 15 rounds, field identity verified max diff 0.000e+00): metric original(20/30) ring(5/10) band-weightable ticks 10.79% 26.45% mean safeTiles/tick 15.19 85.04 ticks with 0 safe (pre-fallback) 58.5% 7.5% safePool >= 4 39.05% 92.47% >=1 safe tile in 100-200px 11.84% 26.64% MEAN CLOSEST-SAFE-TILE DISTANCE 397.78px 284.84px tiles > 10 threshold 0.61 0.15 The 397.78px figure is why the bot stayed far away: the safety filter left nothing safe near the target, and 397px is our WORST range. Control: setting corridor=20 wall=30 reproduces the original baseline exactly. CEILING, honestly: even at corridor 0 / wall 0 only ~40% of ticks are band-weightable, so no constant tweak fully unlocks the range weighting. Ram unification: the ring mover takes a `band` field; ramming becomes just `band=(0,50)`, so there is one movement engine. The `tfil` path is unchanged. Observability: magenta annulus at the band edges, candidates tinted by weight, chosen tile marked; one `[tfil_ring]` log line on change (now including corridorHeat/wallHotness). Guards: test_tfil_ring_weights 24/24 (new, pure, no battle), test_gun_harness 39, test_vbullet_metric 11, test_power_selection 3, test_adaptive_radar 41. UNVERIFIED: the mover's live effect. It has not been run in a battle yet. |